The Nature and Purposes of Research in the Creative Media Industries
Research is a completely vital step in the creation and
development of any media production large or small, without the research you
would be left two slices of bread short of a sandwich and well you can see
where this is going. Put simply research is the core of your foundations and so
must be focused on and paid attention to regardless of how tedious it can be; a
mistake here could shift the viability of your production completely.
(If we wished to find out about the history of film we could do so through sites such as wikipedia, since all of this data was sourced from other places the type of research we would be doing here would be secondary)
(If we wished to find out about the history of film we could do so through sites such as wikipedia, since all of this data was sourced from other places the type of research we would be doing here would be secondary)
Research comes in multiple forms and so it is vital that you can differentiate between them in order to become efficient and accurate with your findings:
- The first type of research you should do is
known as Secondary research, now this sounds incorrect but in fact it makes
perfect sense once you have the term defined. Secondary research is when you
look at existing facts and figures from websites, papers or national archives
that are relevant to the production you are undertaking in order to discover
how things work and ultimately if they work; essentially it is researching
research. An efficient example of mining data on a large scale is data
gathering agencies for example the British Audience Research Board (BARB).
These agencies do the boring work so you don’t have to, well at least not to
the same scale. BARB analyses and organise the data collected from hundreds of
television channels nationwide to collect millions of ratings. main purpose is
to gather data about audiences for other companies and people to use and
benefit from. I personally gathered my secondary data from:
https://www.franchisehelp.com/industry-reports/fitness-industry-report/ http://www.teamusa.org/USA-Weightlifting/Weightlifting101/History-of-Weightliftinghttp://www.statisticbrain.com/gym-membership-statistics/
- The second type of research is known as -you guessed it- Primary research! Now Primary research is not always vital to the creation of a viable product but it is generally speaking advisable. Primary research comes from primary sources (first hand) and that means you have to do your own independent research through questionnaires or interviews in the pursuit of finding out things that tie in to your specific detailing. The methods we used were free survey websites and distributing them online; an issue of this was we were generally connecting to peers and in doing so we are unable to discover the wider spectrum of opinions but for the sake of this project it was more of a practise for future reference than actual decision making and so was fine. In order to gather our secondary research we used the site survey monkey since it allowed us to quickly create and distribute our questionnaire for free.
We reach another couple of forks in the road within our
existing findings and again it boils down to finding more varied and specific
examples. This is where we get the terms Qualitative (qualities) and
Quantitative (quantities) the difference being with quantitative we place a
numerical value towards the thing we are looking for, for example the amounts
of people that enjoyed X over Y And with qualitative we are looking at the
types of people that enjoyed X over Y. Quantitative methodology is much easier
to obtain and faster to plot and explain on charts and graphs, the reason it is
easier to work with is when only one word answers are asked and answered.
Qualitative data is much more time consuming but it reflects the audience with
much more depth and understanding and since it all boils down to target
audience then nine times out of ten qualitative is better at that than
quantitative; however since research takes longer for the person being
questioned we find that they instantly become less likely to want to partake in
the survey and actually sometimes qualitative methodology is completely
irrelevant to the situation.
After the audience researching comes production research, this
is in order to see how financially viable the production is and cover all
aspects such as equipment costs and actually finding the funds in the first
place for the plans to come to fruition.
Reliability
There is a rule that is without doubt true and that rule is
what I like to refer to as the four R’s. The equation goes something like:
Research+Repeating=Reliable Results and it without doubt holds true. Reliability surrounds itself with the idea of accuracy and true knowledge of how something truly is after being tried and tested. If you get enough results then the outliers in qualitative methodology for
example will be
nullified. This happened with my surveys for which we allowed a text box for
people to be able to express specifics and friends of mine would put jokes that
would give me a small laugh but were ultimately useless to me. Also worth
noting are people are likely to either conform to the general populous or throw
me answers they think I need to hear which again throws the scales off balance
and destroy the point in the survey in the first place; however if your survey
can reach globally and be accessed by people of all ages and backgrounds you
will be provided with the ultimate result since you will have the purest idea of what it is you are asking and you will obtain the answers with maximum reliability, the only issue being crunching the numbers but in high volumes computers can be used to interpret and sort your findings.

This is a solid pass and close to a merit but does not have enough examples drawn from both your work and the world of real media, and it is also missing market research and your explanations of reliability, validity, representativeness and generalisability are incomplete.
ReplyDelete